transparency

Maine: Anti-gay marriage group must reveal donors

A federal district judge has ordered the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) to disclose its contributors in the wake of its $1.09 million campaign to revoke gay-marriage rights in Maine. NOM argued that its free speech rights would be violated by revealing its backers. The judge said that state law required the disclosure and served a “compelling” and “critical” interest in providing the information to the voters. -db From Courthouse News Service, February 25, 2011,

Read More »

California: Solano County supervisor accuses colleagues of secret meetings on fairgrounds issue

A Solano county supervisor said her colleagues have resorted to back-room meetings to discuss future plans for the Solano County Fairgrounds. She complained that since there were no reports on the issue from the staff for the last six months that secret meetings must have been convened to instruct the staff.  A staff member said there were only two meetings on the issue, both in January and both were properly noticed to the public. -db

Read More »

California: Monrovia wins open meeting law suit

A Superior Court judge ruled that Monrovia had not violated open meetings laws by making changes to public documents in secret before approving revisions to a development project. The judge said the changes were minor so did not violate the letter and the spirit of the Brown Act, the state’s open meeting law. -db From Monrovia Patch, February 21, 2011, by Nathan McIntire. Full Story

Read More »

California: Santa Rosa City Council dinner meetings stretch state open meeting law

Last summer under fire, the Tulare County Board of Supervisors discontinued “morale-building” luncheon meetings not open to the public. Now the Santa Rosa City Council has resumed a practice of meeting at private dinners that they claim are solely for generating congeniality. But open government advocates are asking if it is advisable to hold the dinners privately so that members of the public cannot verify that council members discussed no city business in violation of

Read More »

Berkeley’s new sunshine rules: a step forward or a detour?

The city of Berkeley has adopted an ordinance that expands access to documents, expands live streaming of meetings and bars confidential legal settlements. But, according to the local Web site Berkeleyside, it also has potential to weaken support for a more far-reaching sunshine ordinance schedule for a public vote in November 2012. The city ordinance, adopted Tuesday, would create an advisory commission that would seek voluntary agreements over open government disputes. By contrast, the much

Read More »