defamation

Federal judge orders ‘investigative blogger’ to pay $2.5 million in defamation case

An Oregon blogger was ordered to pay Obsidian Finance Group $2.5 million for accusing the company of tax fraud on the website ObsidianFinanceSucks.com. The judge rejected claims that the founders of Obsidian were public figures. The Electric Frontier Foundation had filed a brief for the blogger arguing that a previous jury verdict was a threat to free speech. -db From the Courthouse News Service, March 29, 2012, by Nick McCann. Full story   

Read More »

U.S. Supreme Court lets stand dismissal of $10.1 million against Tampa Bay Times

The U.S. Supreme Court decided a libel case in favor of the Tampa Bay Times. A doctor sued over a series of 2003 articles about his demotion from chief of medicine at a medical center to a cardiology specialty. A jury decided for the doctor, but the trial judge threw out the verdict and the $10.1 million judgment on the grounds that the plaintiff’s evidence did not pass First Amendment muster. -db From the Tampa

Read More »

Former policeman arrested for defaming chief wins right to pursue lawsuit

A U.S. district court ruled a former policeman can continue a civil lawsuit against a Louisiana police chief for violating his First Amendment rights. The policeman was arrested for criminal defamation for sending an e-mail to a local newspaper criticizing them for not reporting the chief’s alleged involvement in another officer’s DUI arrest. -db From the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, March 23, 2012, by Andrea Papagianis. Full story    

Read More »

Ron Paul stumbles over First Amendment issue

The Ron Paul campaign for the Republican presidential nomination suffered a setback when a federal judge in California ruled that they could not force Google to reveal the identity of  an anonymous poster of a YouTube video that pretended to be pro-Ron Paul but actually denigrated him. The judge dismissed the case on narrow grounds that the Paul campaign had not filed a valid complaint. -db From a commentary for the Citizens Media Law Project,

Read More »

Opinion: No valid defamation claim for Sandra Fluke against Rush Limbaugh

Even though he finds Rush Limbaugh despicable, Marc J. Randazza writing for the Citizens Media Law Project, argues that Sandra Fluke does not, for a number of reasons, have grounds for a defamation case after Limbaugh called her a “slut” and a “prostitute.” -db From a commentary for the Citizens Media Law Project, March 8, 2012 by Marc J. Randazza. Full story  

Read More »