Federal appeals court strikes down San Francisco’s law for warnings on soft-drink ads
On First Amendment grounds, a panel of the 9th Circuit federal appeals court ruled against a pioneer San Francisco law that required warning labels about health risks on soft-drink ads. The judges argued that sugar is not the same as nicotine in cigarettes in that small amounts of sugar can be part of a healthy diet. They also said that the required warning label was too large and therefore chilled commercial speech. (Grub Street, September