Peter Scheer

FAC sues San Diego PD for records on controversial cell phone surveillance technology

The First Amendment Coalition today filed suit against the San Diego Police Department to obtain information about the SDPD’s purchase and use of surveillance equipment that can identify and track all cell phones in a specific location, such as a building, neighborhood or street intersection. “We believe the SDPD has an obligation to tell San Diego citizens that it is using this invasive technology and to describe the steps it is taking, if any, to

Read More »

Can local legislators speak freely to voters? The answer should be an emphatic “yes.” Too often the answer given is “maybe.”

BY PETER SCHEER–Local government, Republicans and Democrats agree, is the most democratic (with a small d) form of government. The closer government is to the people, the theory goes, the more accountable it is to voters and the more responsive to the public will. Congress is the most remote, hence least accountable; your local city council is the closest, therefore most attuned to your needs and interests. Except in California and several other states where

Read More »

FAC leads amicus filing in case seeking access to records in hands of private firms that contract with government

An open-government coalition led by FAC has filed an amicus brief in a California freedom-of-information case involving access to data of government contractors that the contractors are required, under their agreements wth local government, to create and maintain. In Flynn v. Los Angeles a PRA requester seeks information in databases about the towing and storing of cars parked illegally on LA streets. The towing and storing is handled by private firms under contracts with the

Read More »

The first amendment is in trouble when EU bureaucrats get to decide what US citizens can read on US-based websites

BY PETER SCHEER–Freedom of speech suffered a serious blow when, last May, the European Union’s highest court, in the so-called “Right to be Forgotten” decision,  ruled that Google must remove search results that infringe individual citizens’ privacy rights under EU law. A first amendment red line had been crossed. A major publisher of information–which is what Google, in its search business, most emphatically is–had been directed by government authorities to censor its content. But the

Read More »

Court decision on anti-Islam video is potentially hazardous to investigative journalism

BY PETER SCHEER—Video journalists and documentary filmmakers can breathe easier because of the suspension of a recent appeals court decision that interpreted federal copyright law in a way that might have handed a censor’s power to the subjects of interviews. The case, Garcia v. Google,  concerns  “Innocence of Muslims,” a highly inflammatory film—actually, a 13-minute movie trailer—-that was posted to YouTube in 2012. Intended to shock and offend, the Islamophobic video depicts the prophet Muhammad

Read More »