donal brown

The California Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed a ruling by a superior court judge that prevented a blogger from publishing Fullerton city hall documents regarding police misconduct. The blogger, Joshua Ferguson, and a colleague obtained the records from the city’s Dropbox Account. The city called the records “stolen.” The appeals court blocked the lower court order while it considers the case. As FAC’s David Snyder has explained, such prior restraint is unconstitutional. (Voice of

The State Department and its chief Mike Pompeo are being sued for failure to create and preserve State Department records. The National Security Archive, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Government, and Historians of American Foreign Relations already sued the State Department last May for not keeping records of meetings with foreign leaders including Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. The current lawsuit comes after Ambassador Gordon Sondland made sure

As the 2020 elections near, phony news stories have multiplied on Facebook with 62 percent of the stories going against liberals or Democrats and 29 percent against Republicans or conservatives. Avaaz, a group that tracks misinformation, announced these findings last week. (The Hill, November 6, 2019, by Marty Johnson) A report out of Oxford University in September revealed that Facebook was the preferred forum for governments and political parties bent on distributing fake news. The

With President Donald Trump threatening whistleblowers, a survey of the whistleblower laws reveals serious rents in their protective shields. Whistleblowers are best protected if they go through official channels provided in the laws rather than go directly to the press. While the government may not punish a whistleblower, a president could, as Trump is doing, use his position to threaten and castigate. The Inspector General may not identify the whistleblower, but there is no barrier

The European Union’s Court of Justice ruled that Facebook must remove content around the world if it is illegal, as in defamatory, in one European Union country. The ruling held that local judges could order Facebook to remove illegal content. Facebook argued that such a ruling would hurt freedom of expression. The ruling was made in the case of an Austrian legislator who wanted Facebook to delete defamatory posts from an anonymous user. (Politico, October