donal brown

First Amendment at the Supreme Court: Alito dissents in Mann libel case

The Supreme Court refused to take up an appeal by the National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute of a defamation lawsuit brought by the Penn State climate scientist Michael Mann. The magazine compared Mann to the convicted pedophile Jerry Sandusky and said instead of molesting children he molested and tortured data. (The Hill, November 25, 2-19, by John Kruzel) The National Review claimed it was legitimately contesting Mann’s climate change graph, a matter of

Read More »

ACLU sues over detentions of journalists at border

The American Civil Liberties Union is suing the Trump administration for its attacks on the press at the U.S.-Mexico border. The suit claims U.S. border officials targeted five journalists for detention, interrogation and searches. The lawsuit intends to hold the administration accountable for preventing journalists from informing the public about how the government is treating asylum seekers on the border. (ACLU, November 20, 2019, by Scarlet Kim, Esha Bhandari and Mitra Ebadolahi) The ACLU said

Read More »

Supreme Court takes up law criminalizing speech that encourages illegal immigration

The Supreme Court agreed to consider a 1986 federal law found by the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to be a violation of free speech rights. Ninth Circuit Judge A. Wallace Tashima authored an opinion that found the law could be used to chill political speech and prohibit simple statements of support. (The New York Times, November 11, 2019, by Adam Liptak) The case will test the conservative wing of the Supreme court on

Read More »

Records show few convicted California police officers lost jobs

The media and open government advocates won a battle over the California Attorney General by gaining access to a list of hundreds of current and former police convicted of criminal acts. Journalists obtained the public record by asking a state agency for it, but Attorney General Xavier Becerra claims the journalists are breaking the law by possessing a document it never should have been given. (techdirt, November 15, 2019, by Tim Cushing) With UC Berkeley

Read More »

Planned Parenthood wins judgment over undercover videos

A federal jury in San Francisco found that conservative activists had no right to use hidden cameras to make videos to discredit Planned Parenthood. The jury awarded Planned Parenthood over $2 million. The jury rejected the activist ‘s First Amendment arguments finding “fraud, trespass, breach of contract, illegal recording, civil conspiracy and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.” The Recorder, November 15, 2019, by Ross Todd) David Daleiden and a co-defendant, Sandra

Read More »