See the 2024 Impact Report >>

Search Results

Showing 1 - 10 of 28 results

Asked and Answered

Brown Act CPRA

The mayor refused to let me make a public comment without identifying myself

[…] controversial. Gov't Code § 6254(c). However, this exemption -- which was developed to protect intimate details of personal and family life, not official business judgments and relationships, Bakersfield City School Dist. v. Superior Court, 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1045 (2004) -- applies only to "personnel files ... the disclosure of which would constitute […]

August 26, 2010
Asked and Answered

CPRA

City Stonewalls CPRA Request for Sexual Harassment Complaints Against Council Member

[…] to identifiable public officials or employees that is controversial, the exemption was developed to protect intimate details of personal and family life—not official business judgement and relationships. Bakersfield City School Dist. v. Sup. Ct., 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1045 (2004); Braun v. City of Taft, 154 Cal. App. 3d 332, 343-344 (1984). California […]

November 8, 2018
Asked and Answered

CPRA

The public should know if school employee embezzled $2m

[…] or trivial, and there is reasonable cause to believe the complaint is well founded, public employee privacy must give way to the public's right to know." ( Bakersfield City School District v. Superior Court of Kern County, 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1045 (2004)). From the information in your submission, it sounds like this […]

October 6, 2009
Handbooks

California Public Records Act Primer

[…] 4th 440 (2011). American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees v. Regents of the University of California, 80 Cal. App. 3d 913, 918 (1978) ("AFSCME"). Accord, Bakersfield City School Dist. v. Superior Court, 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1044, 1046 (2004). Id. BRV, Inc. v. Superior Court, 143 Cal. App. 4th 742 (2006). […]
- Government Transparency and Accountability
July 8, 2024
Asked and Answered

CPRA

Releasing settlement information on a public employee’s termination

[…] or trivial, and there is reasonable cause to believe the complaint is well founded, public employee privacy must give way to the public's right to know." ( Bakersfield City School District v. Superior Court of Kern County, 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1045 (2004)). In the situation you describe, it sounds like the investigations […]

June 14, 2009
Asked and Answered

CPRA Police Records

Police claims officer ‘use of force’ reports personnel not public issue

[…] or controversial.Gov't Code § 6254(c). However, this exemption -- which was developed to protect intimate details of personal and family life, not official business judgments and relationships, Bakersfield City School Dist. v. Superior Court, 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1045 (2004)-- applies only to "personnel files ... the disclosure of which would constitute an […]

July 8, 2011
Asked and Answered

Brown Act CPRA

School Superintendent Goals: Public or Private?

[…] would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." Id. This exemption was developed to protect intimate details of personal and family life, not official business judgments and relationships. Bakersfield City School Dist. V. Sup. Ct., 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1045 (2004). Because the information contained in the superintendent’s goals and evaluation criteria pertains to […]

August 14, 2014
Asked and Answered

CPRA

Animal shelter won’t disclose contact info on local cat trapper

[…] pertaining to a public official’s private or controversial information. Gov't Code § 6254(c). However, this exemption was created to protect intimate personal details, not official business judgments. See Bakersfield City School Dist. v. Superior Court, 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1045 (2004). Additionally, the County may attempt to fit the public records under the "catch-all" […]

June 15, 2016
Asked and Answered

Brown Act

Should school superintendent’s goals be made in closed session?

[…] constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy"). However, this exemption was developed to protect intimate details of personal and family life, not official business judgments and relationships. Bakersfield City School Dist. v. Superior Court, 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1045 (2004). The California Court of Appeal has held that "information as to the education, […]

April 13, 2012
Asked and Answered

CPRA

Can I request public staff time cards?

[…] or employees that is private or controversial. However, this exemption was developed to protect intimate details of personal and family life, not official business judgments and relationships. Bakersfield City School Dist. v. Superior Court, 118 Cal. App. 4th 1041, 1045 (2004). The California Supreme Court has held that the names and salaries of individual […]

September 26, 2011