Question
Help me understand the Police Bill of Rights and how these laws impact transparency and constitutional policing reform.
Answer
In 1976, California adopted “the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act,” Govt. Code § 3300-13, which provides peace officers with certain substantive and procedural protections. Perhaps most significantly, the Act establishes limits on how officers may be questioned, investigated, and disciplined. Such laws have been criticized for making it excessively difficult to discipline offices for misconduct. Regardless of one’s position on that issue, the right of public access to law enforcement records is governed by other laws, such as the California Public Records Act and the so-called Pitchess statutes controlling peace officers’ personnel records. Historically, those laws made it difficult if not impossible for the public to obtain records of police misconduct. As discussed in FAC’s police transparency guide, they were amended in 2019 to provide for disclosure of records relating to certain uses of force or forms of misconduct. In September 2021, the Governor signed SB 16, expanding available records to include sustained findings of unreasonable or excessive force or failure to intervene against another officer using such force, sustained findings of prejudice or discrimination, and sustained findings of unlawful search or arrest.
Asked & Answered posts should not be relied on as legal advice, and FAC makes no guarantees about their completeness or accuracy. All posts carry a date of publication that readers should take note of in assessing their usefulness, given that laws and interpretations of them may change over time. Posts predating Jan. 1, 2023, that discuss the California Public Records Act may contain statute numbers no longer in use. Please see this page for a table showing how the California Public Records Act has been renumbered.