Write a review of FAC to help us keep our Top Rated Nonprofit status!

Asked and Answered

How does the Brown Act Apply to ‘Ad Hoc’ Versus ‘Standing’ Committees?

April 14, 2022

Question

Please explain how the Brown Act applies to “ad hoc” versus “standing” committees of municipal government-appointed commissions.

Answer

As a threshold matter, California’s Ralph M. Brown Act applies to any committee of a legislative body that is empowered to make decisions, rather than simply advise.It is only advisory committees that may be exempt from the Brown Act.See Gov. Code section 54952(a)-(b).

As to advisory committees, the Brown Act applies to “standing committees,” butnotto “ad hoc committees.”

The challenge can come in defining which is which.Under the Brown Act a “standing committee” is one that has “continuing subject matter jurisdiction,ora meeting schedule fixed by charter, ordinance, resolution or formal action of a legislative body.” Gov. Code section 54952 (emphasis added).

It’s important to note the highlighted “or” above.If an advisory committee has a fixed meeting schedule, then it is a “standing committee” subject to the Brown Act.But even advisory committees without a fixed meeting schedule will constitute a “standing committee” if they have “continuing subject matter jurisdiction,” for example if a city council were to create a committee empowered to address, e.g., homeless issues in an open-ended and continuing way – even if it does not meet on a regular schedule – then it would be a “standing committee.”

The California Attorney General’sBrown Act publicationsets forth a number of hypothetical examples that help illustrate some of the important distinctions here – see at p. 6 of the publication:

A city council creates four bodies to address various city problems.

  • Commission comprised of councilmembers, the city manager and interested citizens: This committee is covered by the Brown Act because there is no exemption for it regardless of whether it is decisionmaking or advisory in nature.
  • Advisory committee comprised of two councilmembers for the purpose of reviewing all issues related to parks and recreation in the city on an ongoing basis: This committee is a standing committee which is subject to the Act’s requirements because it has continuing jurisdiction over issues related to parks and recreation in the city.
  • Advisory committee comprised of two city councilmembers for the purpose of producing a report in six months on downtown traffic congestion: This committee is an exempt advisory committee because it is comprised solely of less than a quorum of the members of the city council. It is not a standing committee because it is charged with accomplishing a specific task in a short period of time, i.e., it is a limited term ad hoc committee.
  • Advisory committee comprised of two councilmembers to meet on the second Monday of each month pursuant to city council resolution: This committee is subject to the Act as a standing committee because its meeting schedule is fixed by the city council.

— David Snyder, FAC Executive Director

Asked & Answered posts should not be relied on as legal advice, and FAC makes no guarantees about their completeness or accuracy. All posts carry a date of publication that readers should take note of in assessing their usefulness, given that laws and interpretations of them may change over time. Posts predating Jan. 1, 2023, that discuss the California Public Records Act may contain statute numbers no longer in use. Please see this page for a table showing how the California Public Records Act has been renumbered.