Question
I am a former 15 year elected official for a small airport special district. Prior to being a board member, I have been a hangar tenant at the same airport. In 2008 I decided to not run for another term and became a spectator. What I observed with the new Board was an immediate termination of the GM and hiring of a new GM with no public sector experience.
Since his employment, I caught and exposed some misuse of public funds, taking gifts from contractors. Also, the Brown Act is violated at nearly every meeting. Contracts involving money all done in closed sessions.
All these and more are exposed by me at public meetings. I am as harsh on the Board as the GM, since they ignore the wrongs.
The Board has never challenged or rebutted any of my remarks. Instead, everytime I spoke at a meeting, I would receive emails inferring my hangar insurance was in question. When I inquired, I never received an explanation or any response. Time would go by, I attend another meeting, then another email about insurance, until finally I received notice that I would no longer have access to my hanger although the rent was always paid in full and on time. Who helps citizens in my situation? Any gov agency? Legal group? I can’t afford to hire an atty to fight a government agency with unlimited funds. Thanks
Answer
Indeed, retaliation by the government against a person for exercising his First Amendment right of free speech is prohibited under the constitution.See, e.g., Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250, 256 (2006) (as a general matter, the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subject an individual to retaliatory actions for speaking out); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 597 (1972) (government officials may not punish a person or deprive him or her of a benefit on the basis of his or her “constitutionally protected speech”).
If an individual is singled out and subject to disfavorable treatment in retaliation for that person’s speech, this may be a violation of the individual’s First Amendment rights.
Holme Roberts & Owen LLP is general counsel for the First Amendment Coalition and responds to FAC hotline inquiries. In responding to these inquiries, we can give general information regarding open government and speech issues but cannot provide specific legal advice or representation.
Asked & Answered posts should not be relied on as legal advice, and FAC makes no guarantees about their completeness or accuracy. All posts carry a date of publication that readers should take note of in assessing their usefulness, given that laws and interpretations of them may change over time. Posts predating Jan. 1, 2023, that discuss the California Public Records Act may contain statute numbers no longer in use. Please see this page for a table showing how the California Public Records Act has been renumbered.