<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org</link>
	<description>Defending Free Speech and Your Right to Know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A&amp;A: Can an individual publish a legal notice in a newspaper??</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/aa-can-an-individual-publish-a-legal-notice-in-a-newspaper/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/aa-can-an-individual-publish-a-legal-notice-in-a-newspaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>1stamendmnt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asked & Answered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Q: Is there any legal reason why  an individual would not be allowed to place a paid legal notice in a newspaper? The content is to inform the public about a woman being unlawfully tormented and hunted in the judicial system. A: I believe you are asking whether a newspaper that publishes legal notices is [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/aa-can-an-individual-publish-a-legal-notice-in-a-newspaper/">A&#038;A: Can an individual publish a legal notice in a newspaper??</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/aa-can-an-individual-publish-a-legal-notice-in-a-newspaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Administration dives for cover in AP phone record incident</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/administration-dives-for-cover-in-ap-phone-record-incident/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/administration-dives-for-cover-in-ap-phone-record-incident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Attorney General Eric Holder defended the seizure of Associated Press phone records in an investigation of leaks involving the CIA, saying that it was necessary to uphold national security. (The New York Times, May 14, 2013, by Charlie Savage and Scott Shane) But to insure that everyone believed their statements about the importance of free [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/administration-dives-for-cover-in-ap-phone-record-incident/">Administration dives for cover in AP phone record incident</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/administration-dives-for-cover-in-ap-phone-record-incident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal in free speech case over graphic abortion images</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/appeal-in-free-speech-case-over-graphic-abortion-images/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/appeal-in-free-speech-case-over-graphic-abortion-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 19:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Thomas Moore Society has filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a Colorado Supreme Court decision in a case in which an anti-abortion protester was ruled disruptive for displaying large photos of aborted fetuses near a Palm Sunday procession with about 200 children present. Some of the children were upset by [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/appeal-in-free-speech-case-over-graphic-abortion-images/">Appeal in free speech case over graphic abortion images</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/appeal-in-free-speech-case-over-graphic-abortion-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scandal over Bloomberg use of client data</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/scandal-over-bloomberg-use-of-client-data/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/scandal-over-bloomberg-use-of-client-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 19:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bloomberg News reporters were using the company&#8217;s financial data terminals to monitor login activity to gain an edge in covering market and trading news. Bloomberg editor-in-chief Matthew Winkler admitted the practice was long standing and apologized saying it was an inexcusable error. (The New York Times, May 13, 2013, by Amy Chozick) After JKMorganChase complained [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/scandal-over-bloomberg-use-of-client-data/">Scandal over Bloomberg use of client data</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/scandal-over-bloomberg-use-of-client-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department seizes AP phone records</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/justice-department-seizes-ap-phone-records/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/justice-department-seizes-ap-phone-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Justice Department authorized a confiscation of phone records of Associated Press reporters and editors that many feel is an egregious attack on freedom of the press. The government&#8217;s action is thought to be part of an investigation into the leaking of information a year ago about a foiled Yemen-based plot to bomb an airliner. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/justice-department-seizes-ap-phone-records/">Justice Department seizes AP phone records</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/justice-department-seizes-ap-phone-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The SEC should go forward with a rule requiring corporations to publicly disclose their campaign contributions.</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/the-sec-should-go-forward-with-a-rule-requiring-corporations-to-publicly-disclose-their-campaign-contributions-if-we-wait-for-congress-to-mandate-disclosure-well-be-waiting-forever/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/the-sec-should-go-forward-with-a-rule-requiring-corporations-to-publicly-disclose-their-campaign-contributions-if-we-wait-for-congress-to-mandate-disclosure-well-be-waiting-forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 08:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Scheer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peter Scheer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you believe public corporations should be required to disclose their political campaign contributions, there’s a simple solution. It is the solution that is being considered by the Securities Exchange Commission in Washington&#8211; namely, to treat contributions as material transactions and, on that basis, require that they be disclosed, like profits, losses, lawsuits, etc, in [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/the-sec-should-go-forward-with-a-rule-requiring-corporations-to-publicly-disclose-their-campaign-contributions-if-we-wait-for-congress-to-mandate-disclosure-well-be-waiting-forever/">The SEC should go forward with a rule requiring corporations to publicly disclose their campaign contributions.</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/the-sec-should-go-forward-with-a-rule-requiring-corporations-to-publicly-disclose-their-campaign-contributions-if-we-wait-for-congress-to-mandate-disclosure-well-be-waiting-forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dating imperiled by government speech mandate</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/dating-imperiled-by-government-speech-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/dating-imperiled-by-government-speech-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Departments of Justice and Education are ordering every U.S. college and university to enact speech codes that include restrictions on expression on sexual topics that offend any person; sexually themed jokes that are considered offensive; and requests for dates or flirtation not welcomed by the recipient.&#8221;&#8230;the Departments of Justice and Education have mandated a [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/dating-imperiled-by-government-speech-mandate/">Dating imperiled by government speech mandate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/dating-imperiled-by-government-speech-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds request removal from Internet of 3D handgun designs</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/feds-request-removal-from-internet-of-3d-handgun-designs/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/feds-request-removal-from-internet-of-3d-handgun-designs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The State Department prevailed on Defense Distributed, a Texas nonprofit, to remove from the Internet designs for a pistol. State said the act of distributing these designs online violated federal law restricting transfer and access of data for designated weapons. (Courthouse News Service, May 13, 2013, by David Lee) The incident inspired a detailed blog [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/feds-request-removal-from-internet-of-3d-handgun-designs/">Feds request removal from Internet of 3D handgun designs</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/feds-request-removal-from-internet-of-3d-handgun-designs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open data era for federal government holds great promise</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/open-data-era-for-federal-government-holds-great-promise/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/open-data-era-for-federal-government-holds-great-promise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama ordered a new Open Data Policy May 10 to make open data the new default for releasing information in the federal government. The order is expected to provide business and research concerns with data  to spur innovation and enterprise. (E Pluribus Unum, May 10, 2013, by Alex Howard) While praising the order, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/open-data-era-for-federal-government-holds-great-promise/">Open data era for federal government holds great promise</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/open-data-era-for-federal-government-holds-great-promise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to court documents argued in 9th Circuit</title>
		<link>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/access-to-court-documents-argued-in-9th-circuit/</link>
		<comments>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/access-to-court-documents-argued-in-9th-circuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 20:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donal brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/?p=25384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments on press access to courts this week with the California state court attorney asserting that the case belonged in state courts and attorneys for the press citing a Ninth Circuit ruling that a 48-hour delay in access to court documents violated the First Amendment. (Courthouse News [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/access-to-court-documents-argued-in-9th-circuit/">Access to court documents argued in 9th Circuit</a> appeared first on <a href="http://firstamendmentcoalition.org">FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://firstamendmentcoalition.org/2013/05/access-to-court-documents-argued-in-9th-circuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
